flwyd: Ham radio on cliffs overlooking Keauhou Bay, Hawai'i (ham radio hawaii parks on the air)
The radio frequency spectrum is organized in bands (ranges of frequencies), with each band dedicated to one or more radio services (purposes and licensing systems). For example, U.S. broadcast radio is in two bands: the AM broadcast band is from 535 kHz to 1.705 MHz and the FM broadcast band is from 88 MHz to 108 MHz. (Here's a nice chart.) In many radio services, each frequency is assigned to a specific station in a specific area. For example, KOA in Denver is the only station allowed to transmit on 850 kHz with significant power at night in the continental US, and in the daytime in most of the western US.

The amateur radio service (ham radio) doesn't assign frequencies to specific stations. Amateur bands are open to anyone with an appropriate license, and it's up to amateur operators to avoid operating on a frequency that's already in use. This is normally fairly straightforward: listen first, then ask if anyone's using the frequency, then you can call CQ (ask people to call you). High frequency radio waves have a limited range though, and also a short-range "skip zone" where they can't be heard. So sometimes two people are calling CQ on the same frequency, but can't hear each other. I occasionally run into this situation with single sideband: one station in Florida and one station in Georgia might both be seeking contacts. If their timing is such that I can make out which is which by the sound of their voice, I can sometimes work both stations and tell them that another station is on the same frequency.

I've been practicing Morse code lately, and while some operators have a distinct "fist" (keying rhythm), often the only way to tell the dits and dahs of two transmissions apart is by the signal strength, if that. Today in the weekly K1USN SST slow speed contest I was listening to several rounds until I worked out the operator's callsign before calling them. An exchange is information given by the two parties in a contact. If K1USN is calling CQ and W1AW contacts them, the full sequence would be something like
CQ SST DE K1USN
W1AW
W1AW GA WATSON MA
TU WATSON HIRAM CT
TU HIRAM ES 73
with DE short for from, ES for and, GA for good afternoon, TU for thank you, MA/CT are state abbreviations, and 73 stands for kind regards, end of conversation. After a few passes, I'd written down W6RIF, called him, and got his exchange as WARREN IL (Warren in Illinois). I said TU WARREN TREVOR CO and moved on. I typed up my log file at home and ran it through a script I wrote to double check callsigns and states against the FCC database. I was surprised to discover that W6RIF is named Reed and lives in Virginia; neither the names nor the states sound similar in Morse code. I was pretty sure I'd copied the callsign correctly, and I relied on my phone to pick up the name. I searched QRZ for several variants with wildcards in various places, none of which turned up a more promising operator. I tried searching QRZ for just warren but in a hobby dominated by old white guys, there are a few thousand. I recalled finding a text file of SST operators and their exchanges, only one of whom is Warren from Illinois: KC9IL. I could confuse IF for IL (L and F both have three dits and a dah, with the dah one position different), but it's implausible that I misheard KC9 as W6R; none of those letters sound like the other. I had the insight to check the Reverse Beacon Network where people run software to automatically spot (announce that they heard) stations calling CQ in CW (Morse code) or digital modes. I looked up both callsigns, and saw they were both calling CQ on the same frequency in the same time range. It's possible that both of them responded to me at the same time, but I only picked up Warren's exchange. Maybe I ended up in both of their logs. I'm surprised they didn't notice each other on the same frequency: Virginia Beach and Chicago are far apart to be well out of the skip zone on 20 meters, but close enough to have a clear signal.

High frequency and medium frequency amateur radio is a curious hobby. In an era where you can place a phone call or send a short message to almost anyone on the planet for cheap, hams have to concentrate to pull out callsigns, names, and other details in the spaces between simultaneous transmissions, over atmospheric noise and static from thunderstorms, and signals fading in and out. Before I got my General class license, I was curious why someone would do this. The answer: it's fun in part because it's hard to communicate. It's a bit like a game of chance, strongly influenced by skill and appropriate use of technology.

Morse or Less

Monday, March 31st, 2025 09:48 pm
flwyd: (parks on the air)
Amateur radio operators are probably the only folks who regularly use Morse code in the 21st Century. Long distance communication today generally happens by voice or digital data; and often voice encoded as data. Militaries stopped training radio operators in Morse code. The final US telegram was sent in 2006; in India it was 2013. Britain's service ended in 1981. Those articles report that in 1920, Western Union charged 5 cents per word (when a nickel was worth something) and the Royal Post Office charged a penny per word, with an exchange rate of about 3 pence per nickel. Back when phone plans didn't just bundle unlimited SMS, it seemed 5 cents (at 2005 value) was the going rate… with space to fit about 20 short words. And anyone with access to the Internet has been able to send thousands of words for free via e-mail for more than three decades.

A couple things keep the dits and dahs of Morse code flowing on the amateur radio airwaves. One is tradition: it's a hobby stereotypically practiced by old dudes, and they had to demonstrate Morse code proficiency to get their license (prior to 2007), so there's a comfortable feeling to it, even if they're not banging out the QSOs with a Vibroplex bug on a Hallicrafters solid-state transmitter.

But it's not just nostalgia that keeps Morse code alive. There are practical advantages to Morse and Continuous Wave. CW puts all the transmitter's power into a narrow bandwidth which is either on or off, and the duration of those emissions create the code pattern. This makes CW ideally suited for low-power long-distance transmissions, also known as "weak signal". While clear-channel AM broadcasters used 50 kilowatts to carry Art Bell's voice across the Great Plains, Art as ham operator W6OBB could have conveyed a message just as far with a one or two watt CW signal. It would've taken a lot longer to relay the caller's story about an alien abduction, though. The AM signal spends half its power on the carrier wave, and the other half is split between two identical modulated waves above and below the carrier frequency, spreading out 5 kilohertz in each direction. The CW signal fits in 100 hertz or so, so it's more like a laser pointer than like a lightbulb.

That narrow bandwidth also means the receiver can listen with a really tight filter. Lower-frequency radio bands often have a lot of static; for an example listen to your AM radio during a summer night with a lot of thunderstorms, or listen to the 75 meter band almost any night of the year. (If you enjoy eavesdropping on colorful characters, the latter offers hours of free entertainment.) The wider the bandwidth of the receiver, the more atmospheric static you'll get in your audio signal and the harder it will be to hear what anyone's saying. But with a CW filter that's only a few hundred hertz wide, you can pick out enough of the dits and dahs to understand the transmission.

Finally, the technology for a CW radio transmitter is about as simple as you can get. A straight key or an iambic paddle closes an electric circuit to send a signal; releasing the lever opens the circuit to stop transmitting. The rest of the circuitry doesn't need to modulate or demodulate the signal, so a student or tinkerer could conceivably start from scratch and end up with a working radio. The cheapest CW transceiver kit I've seen is $15 (but it doesn't have the ability to change frequency). And any mechanism you can think of to complete a circuit can be made into a CW key. (I'm interested in trying the QLF sewing machine pedal, and the nail clipper key should be quite portable.)

I realized the value of CW when I was preparing for a trip to Hawaii. It took a lot of work to pull off ten single-sideband (2.5 kHz bandwidth) contacts in two hours with a 45-watt amplifier, since it's 2500 miles to California. I realized I could probably have lightened my load and still pulled off the activation with a 5 or 10 watt radio and morse code. I even got a light-weight paddle and spent time on the airplane with a Morse code tutor. I didn't end up sending any CW from the island, which is probably just as well… I might have been able to copy at five words per minute.

Last year I set a Parks on the Air goal of making at least one CW contact with each activation. I definitely didn't hit the "every activation" goal (particularly in the fall and winter months when I preferred keeping my gloves on to hit the mic's PTT button), but I did manage to make over 133 CW contacts from more than 20 parks. Sunday evening POTA activations also proved a good opportunity to participate in the weekly K1USN SST slow-speed CW "contest". I was pretty reliant on a decoder app, but I could reliably send at 12 to 15 WPM and a healthy Farnsworth spacing. I can recognize my own WT0RJ callsign by ear with no problem, and CQ SST stands out quite clearly. Visually following the app makes it hard for me to also focus on listening, so recently I've taken to tuning to a station calling CQ, getting their callsign from the app, and then waiting until I can pick out all the characters by ear before responding.

I've also recently gotten a chance to be hands-on with the hardware side. Last year at a hamfest I bought both a Brown Bros CTL-B combined paddle and straight-key crafted in the late 1970s (photo) and a light-weight 3D printed paddle kit made my a local ham. The former doesn't have an output jack, just screw terminals. This February I finally got around to taking it to my office's maker space to wrap three wires around the terminals and inside a 3.5mm jack. The hefty base and hard plastic paddles make for a noticeably different feel when operating. I need to experiment with the screws to find my ideal motion range, but it definitely feels more precise. A few weeks ago I also finally got around to constructing the 3D printed kit. I almost screwed it up by soldering too long a tip on the short wires, but I managed to route everything in the box without impediment. For a base I picked up a very thin sheet of steel which seems to stay with half sitting under a radio, so I can stick the magnetic feet to it and keep the paddle from sliding all over the place while I swipe left and right to call CQ.

Now I've got all the technology, I just need to make time for dedicated practice…
February 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2026

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Subscribe

RSS Atom
Page generated Sunday, March 8th, 2026 05:34 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios