Active Entries
- 1: Watch out, it's getting worse
- 2: Head Cold
- 3: 2024: A Year in POTA
- 4: Visual Thinking by Temple Grandin
- 5: Please call Congress about permitting reform today
- 6: Election timing and the wheel of the year
- 7: Joy of Missing Out
- 8: Did you know the toothbrush was invented in West Virginia?
- 9: If I told you you had a celestial body, would you move it in front of the sun?
- 10: Florid Spam
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 04:34 am (UTC)Case in point: I deliberately avoided precise definitions of "male," "female," "masculine," and "feminine." The basics of male and female are pretty simple: X or Y chromosome, penis or vagina, chest hair or breasts, and so on. I also have hormone levels and non-sex physical characteristics in mind, which aren't as cut and dry since most are a matter of degree.
I think we can make significant headway in defining "masculine" and "feminine" by correlation to gender. If a lot more men do P we can label that masculine, if Q is a majority-female activity we can call it feminine. This is predicated on the (reasonable, I think) assumption that there are a lot more types 5 and 21 than types 1 and 25. Just as it's produced differences in typical weight and height, evolution has produced tangible differences in typical behavior between males and females, and those differences can be classified masculine and feminine. There are doubtless cultural influences as well, but I think they can be classified (at first pass, anyway) in the same way.
Again, I don't claim this is a perfect model nor is my goal to conclusively define gender terms. The graph may even be useful to people with different perspective on what constitutes gender. Someone raised in a matriarchal society would consider leadership a feminine attribute and thus might place, say, Hillary Clinton as a type 22 while someone raised in patriarchy would label her a type 2. A composite plot of a few hundred people done by many participants in two cultures could be a way to study differences in gender expectations.