Active Entries
- 1: Head Cold
- 2: 2024: A Year in POTA
- 3: Visual Thinking by Temple Grandin
- 4: Please call Congress about permitting reform today
- 5: Election timing and the wheel of the year
- 6: Joy of Missing Out
- 7: Did you know the toothbrush was invented in West Virginia?
- 8: If I told you you had a celestial body, would you move it in front of the sun?
- 9: Florid Spam
- 10: Donating your body to SCIENCE!
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2008-10-26 02:07 am (UTC)I'm a little more conservative than you are with respect to Amendment 51. It's not that I don't feel bad for retarded people, and I do think we as a society have a responsibility to take care of them. I just think this is the wrong way to do it - feels like a special interest handout. Also, I don't like that it's a sales tax. If someone came to me and said, "Care to bump our state income tax $30/yr to help the retarded?" then I'd say "hell yes." But sales taxes are regressive as they disproportionally tax people of lower income. Good idea, bad implementation.
And just to say it again, as so many people have before, Amendment 48 is madness. It would define ectopic pregnancies as legal people. Meaning, saving the life of the mother would be equivalent to murder. I'm half expecting these idiots to put a measure on the next ballot giving sperm person-hood...