flwyd: (java logo)
flwyd ([personal profile] flwyd) wrote2008-11-20 12:06 am

Ruby Soup

I had a thought at work the other day. Java has a strict one-parent-class rule. Philosophically, this is a good match in domains like taxonomic biology (a phylum is in one kingdom, a genus is in one family). But it's a terrible match in domains like cooking. A soup inherits flavors from many sources. You can add meat to what was originally a vegetable stew. Ruby is a much better language for programming a curry.

[identity profile] slyviolet.livejournal.com 2008-11-20 07:37 am (UTC)(link)
You could really chip a tooth on ruby soup.

Are you intentionally skirting around the obvious pun?

[identity profile] rubicantoto.livejournal.com 2008-11-21 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
Would that there were a programming language with your surname....Stone soup would have to find a way to materially reward the programmer for adding more and more superclasses to an uninteresting base.

Re: Are you intentionally skirting around the obvious pun?

[identity profile] flwyd.livejournal.com 2008-11-21 06:00 am (UTC)(link)
The pun that actually ended up in the dish was much tastier and far more appropriate.

[identity profile] mackys.livejournal.com 2008-11-21 05:55 am (UTC)(link)
That's what composition is for, you insensitive clod! ;]

[identity profile] flwyd.livejournal.com 2008-11-21 05:58 am (UTC)(link)
Composition is good for sandwiches and bacon. Not so much for anything you can put in a blender.