Date: 2017-05-22 07:40 pm (UTC)
siderea: (0)
From: [personal profile] siderea
Humans don't have biological division of reproductive labor, but by gum we are hell-bent on developing it technologically. What does it say about our species that the moment you give the females conscious control over their fertility, the birth rate drops like a rock and large numbers of women – myself among them – elect to be, effectively, infertile workers?

It – and other psychological phenomena – makes me think that while human morphology doesn't support the eusociality hypothesis, human psychology is way, way, WAY out in front on that. I have been thinking for a long time that we may be witnessing the evolution of true bee-style eusociality emerge in humans. Let's check back in a few hundred thousand years to see if women with my sort of personality are born without functional reproductive systems. :)

ETA: to throw in a little data, because I think a lot of people don't know this: apparently about 15% of women in the US never have children. Some of those wanted to have children but couldn't, due to infertility or lack of opportunity; but it's also clear some women have children despite taking pains not to.
From:
Anonymous
OpenID
Identity URL: 
User
Account name:
Password:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
Subject:
HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Message:

 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of people who comment anonymously.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.
August 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2017

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Friday, September 22nd, 2017 07:59 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios